Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although  how to reduce emf exposure 're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves.  how to block radiation from wifi router  are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For  how to block cell tower radiation , co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.